Link
360 degree feedback, organizational trust, change & sustainability
360 in development – Part 2: Managing by Numbers
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Friday, 26 June 2009
No one has demonstrated that putting numbers on managers is a reliable way to improve performance – any more than grades can be relied on to bring out the best in students. What does work, however, is feedback. Put managers in touch with the reality of what is going on and they almost always improve – which is what the numbers were supposed to do, but don’t. Why not? Because numbers don’t represent the complexity of the real world sufficiently well and because managers will do their best to fiddle numbers, but will usually accept reality – even if with some initial confusion and denial.

All right, I recant a little: sometimes in a really open environment managers handle the numbers well but conditions aren't always as good as some imagine – and not for all the managers. And there still remains the problem of: "This is the rating I got – now what do I do?"

The 360 Facilitated® approach brings a manager back to their team to face the reality of its concerns – perhaps the ultimate way to bring about change. But we shouldn’t expect that change always must always come from the manager - anymore than the old downward appraisal always assumes that changes much come from the staff! There will usually be change in the team, as well as the manager, and often in the organisation and its procedures and policies – the environment in which managers and teams must operate.

With the aim of creating an atmosphere of openness and dialogue between team and manager, the 360 Facilitated® approach keeps the profile confidential to the manager. The manager is committed to talking about it with the team, but at least the profile itself is theirs.

The 360 Facilitated® process succeeds in bringing real change and improvement quite independently of there being any manager appraisal process or rating systems. If you want to link the process to appraisal, you can’t use the manager’s profile. Why not? Simply because the profile is a product of team and manager in the context of the organization at a point in time – and the manager shouldn't be held fully accountable for all that.

Amusingly enough, in our work, we have seen extremes of this:
  • The easy-going team that had little change to suggest because it didn’t want to rock the boat and upset the low performing manager
  • The demanding team suggesting a lot of change to a high performing manager
  • The team suggesting a lot of change to a manager for problems over which the manager had no control – organizational issues.
The link you require to appraisal is therefore not the profile, but the output – the actions that are agreed by all parties as a result. This is what the manager signs off on, and this can and should be part of the performance management process: “You looked at the real situation with the team; together you created action plans – now what’s the result?” If performance management is truly about getting results, then this is the result we should be measuring.
To be continued…
[more]

Labels: , , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 10:00 PM   0 comments
Appreciative Inquiry and Coaching with Jo McAlpine
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Monday, 22 June 2009

Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is a powerful force when used in coaching. The International Coach Federation (NSW) is presenting a program with Jo McAlpine which shows neatly the links between the AI methodology and first class coaching:


NSW ICFA Chapter LIVE event

Thursday, 25th June 2009 6:30pm to 8:15pm

Members & Guests Welcome


But you do have to book:

Tel: +61 (0)2 4340 8871



See you there!

Labels: , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 6:23 PM   0 comments
History getting closer
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Sunday, 14 June 2009
Interesting updates on Global Warming

Three segments worth hearing/reading:

1 - Review of Ian Plimer's 500 pp book 'Heaven + Earth' denying global warming. Compares it unfavourably to sci fi.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2009/2593166.htm#transcript

2 - Review of James Lovelock's 'In Search of Gaia'. A very interesting account of his life, hopes and concerns - and what he really means by 'Gaia'.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2009/2596702.htm#transcript

3 - Alan Weisman, author of 'The World Without Us' gives some clear examples of what is likely to happen around the globe, and what might happen if Gaia got rid of us altogether - (hope not, but not an impossible scenario).
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2009/2596708.htm#transcript

And then: Paul Gilding - from Greenpeace to Business. A rough presentation of 'What really is our greatest challenge'. The great disruption:
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/backgroundbriefing/stories/2009/2592909.htm#transcript
[more]

Labels: , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 11:20 PM   0 comments
360 in development - Part 1: Leadership
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Wednesday, 3 June 2009

We are often asked to explain how 360 Facilitated® fits into an organization’s development program that may well include leadership training, quality management, teamwork, communication, learning and development, performance management and much more!

The answer is that it contributes fundamental components to all of them – it can even be made central to all of them. Why? Because it is based on a holistic model of how managers and teams interact – which includes all of that. Let’s consider just one component...

Leadership
Ideas about leadership can be learned in a classroom but leadership only becomes part of the person when they are confronted by the real world, make choices about what they do and learn from them. If we accept Peter Farey’s definition of leadership as proactive, future oriented, changing people’s beliefs and developing values, then the top half of his Leader/Manager Model (see the diagram) is about that. If leadership is thought to be lacking in an organization, then what better way to find out what is missing than by asking those who are led! Of course, you’ll only get their perceptions (what else!) but can leaders safely ignore perceptions?

If team members ask for more leadership, or less, then managers must act to change this perception – whatever the cause may be. And what better way to find the cause of a perception than ask the perceiver? The Leader/Manager Model has the virtue of raising the great body of leadership issues, whether of leading the people or of leading the task into the future. Yet at the same time it raises the management issues – how the people are being dealt with and how the task is being carried out – the issues that are in view right at the moment.

The Leader/Manager Model is not one of those models that in recent times discovered leadership as the new trend, another swing of the pendulum, and had to add it in. Because of its broad based, holistic nature, it has always (since Peter Farey first published it in 1988) stood for the balance of leadership vs. management, of future vs. present.

In its 360 Facilitated® programs, Leaderskill Group makes the Model its prime approach to developing the relationship between team and manager. When this interaction is facilitated, the invitation is given to all parties to be open to all the issues. A clearly structured process is used to build morale, develop understanding, take up challenges, and address the central issues, leading them through to action plans and learning contracts.

Facilitators demonstrate fast and effective leadership in the way they make this process successful, and encourage managers and team members to make the process their own. There is role modelling, learning and reinforcement. Yes, it is most certainly leadership development.
To be continued...
[more]

Labels: , , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 7:25 PM   0 comments
Pigs' revenge
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Monday, 4 May 2009
Anyone who has looked at the way pigs are treated by humans can only feel sorry for them, whether in the Third World, where they often live in their own excrement with one leg tied to a stake, or in the First World where they may pass their lives held in a steel clamp.

Pigs have brains not all that different from our own. The New York Times once ran an article on pigs and said that 'Pigs are as intelligent, loyal and social as dogs, and much cleaner.' How then do we get to the point of making them the objects of derision? By ill-treating them.

Is inhumane treatment of animals one of the elements that make up the World for Tomorrow's Child that is the Ideal Vision of MegaPlanning? It doesn't seem like it. Whatever our needs for food may be, they should not compromise our future and that of our children. Massive factory farming of pigs - as in Mexico and elsewhere today, their faeces pouring out into the local water supply - does provide the perfect breeding ground for disease. The exact relation between pigs and swine flu' is not the issue. If it didn't actually come from pigs this time, then next time. Experts have been warning about this for years. Funny that it's the pig farmers that deny it! Take a look at what the Mexican government has to say. You have to scroll down a bit to get to the nitty gritty of pig farms in Mexico (often US owned).

You know the saying: what goes around comes around. Are the pigs fighting back?
[more]

Labels: , , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 6:53 AM   0 comments
Earth Hour today - again!
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Saturday, 28 March 2009
A year has gone by! And a lot of work has been done. The promotion of Earth Hour in Sydney this year is even greater than last and is aim to get over 1 billion people worldwide!

What does Earth Hour really achieve?
  • It proves we can cut greenhouse emissions
  • It proves we want to do this, we look to our future and are prepared to play our part as individuals
  • It demonstrates to the world of business that we are starting to think about the sustainability of those we buy from. Profits will flow to those who think long-term and protect our future.

For those businesses wanting to move towards sustainability - and prove it - there is a well established, and easy to use structure for doing this. Check out Mega Planning - it takes strategic planning to a new level, and makes it very user friendly.

Meantime, switch off 8.30-9.30 pm tonight. Enjoy a little freedom from light.

Here is a link to the Sydney Morning Herald, a major sponsor, together with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

Labels: , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 4:06 PM   0 comments
Clean up your act, Oz!
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Wednesday, 21 January 2009
Back from a great holiday break, the first thing I see (other than Obama and global happiness - almost) is that Australians are insulting in their manners to Brits and Yanks. This is what Yahoo News says:

"Manners maketh the businessman, with a global survey finding Americans and Britons to be the most easily insulted by lack of workplace etiquette, while Australians are among the most offensive.
"The survey, by Australian-based international office space provider Servcorp, listed the top five most offensive workplace behaviors as not saying hello or good morning, not offering office guests a beverage, speaking loudly across the room, using swear words and taking calls on mobile phones.
"The use of stationery without permission and asking colleagues about their personal lives were also deemed insulting."

And it goes on from there, for instance:

"Almost 25 percent of Australians, however, thought it was perfectly acceptable to swear -- something the majority of Japanese and Middle Easterners found deeply offensive."

Informality? It's great, nice quality we have in Oz. Insensitivity? It's lousy, gets us nowhere. So wise up to the culture you're dealing with. And anyway, do you really want to present yourself like that?

By the way, we could take a tip from Barack Obama - everything he says is inclusive of all, and positive focused. How much better can you get?
[more]

Labels: ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 11:25 AM   0 comments
Introducing the Leader/Manager: No. 9 - Emotional Intelligence - always there
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Friday, 12 December 2008
Well I did promise a few more words on Emotional Intelligence and here is:

We knew from first hearing about Emotional Intelligence that there are questions (behaviours) in the Leader/Manager question set that fit the definition of EI. When we did the stats, we were pleased to find that they correlated very well together. From this we developed a way to indicate which of these questions suggested that a focus on EI could be useful in development, and which suggested that this area was going well - or at least as well as the profile overall. A neat display page made this very easy to decide.

So now a manager looking at his/her profile can get a quick run down on their EI skills as perceived by Respondents, and take (or not take) action. This has proved to be very useful information to use in the Manager Debrief session and sometimes gives clear guidance in relation to the profile overall.

So after all the hoo-ha, EI is not new to the Leader/Manager. We very much welcome it. EI is a natural part of all interaction between people working together, and therefore simply forms a part of the holistic Leader/Manager Model - always has. Nothing had to be modified to add or include EI. All that was required was to put a spotlight on that particular element of the profile and let managers work with it. But if someone feels that their managers can't handle it (don't laugh, such views have been expressed!), or if they're all EI'd out (and that's happened in some organizations), then we can switch it off. 360 Facilitated® is nothing if not flexible!
[more]

Labels: , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 5:54 PM   0 comments
Are Americans becoming stupid?
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Monday, 1 December 2008
Couldn't resist this one. Better take a look at it. Not just Americans - Australians, too, and lots of others! Could save your life - or at least extend it. If it's a health issue, it's a Sustainability issue. Click on Natural News at:
[more]

Labels: ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 9:15 AM   0 comments
Social Leadership takes off
bookmark this at :: del.icio.us :: Digg it
Saturday, 29 November 2008
I hadn't really much idea of what to expect when I attended the launch of Social Leadership at a conference at UNSW in Sydney. The day was truly remarkable. The presenters first threw overboard all the tried, touted and failed definitions of Leadership as the strong man (usually) promising the rest of us that he has the Vision of where we should be headed, and he will be sure to lead us there.

They then redefined Leadership as the rediscovery of who you (the Leader) actually are as a human being, and where we (the Followers) actually want to go, and your support in getting us there. The active process they termed Adaptive Leadership (not 'innate'), which also takes account of the patience with which you may have to modify the culture as you take it forward. I am not so sure about the language - I prefer the name we have always used in our work: Facilitative Leadership (based on the work of Thomas Gordon) - but never mind, the approach is similar and it is a delight to see these ideas professionally promoted, with corporate support, and with a legion of alumni from the Social Leadership program, well trained in courses over the last ten years.

By the way, this is an extension of the Sydney Leadership program, which is now on the national scene and already with international reach. One of the speakers (or facilitators) was Dean Williams of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government (not the Business School!), a riveting speaker. And he's an Australian. The other was Amanda Sinclair of Melbourne Business School - she held the stage brilliantly and actually brought yoga into the day!

All of the this is the product of The Benevolent Society (BenSoc), 195 years old , aiming to help the disadvantaged since its inception. The success of its methods is becoming interesting to the Corporate Sector, some elements of which are beginning to realise that the lavishly overpaid CEO is no guarantee of any kind of future. Similarly, they have seen that Tom Peter's In Search of Excellence companies fell badly within 15 years. BenSoc is offering a solution, honed for the Not For Profit sector but perhaps eventually having much more widespread application. Their approach, in seeking first to know the future that people want, has much in common with Roger Kaufman's MegaPlanning. By the way, Kaufman and associates have a new blog at: http://www.megaplanning.com/blog
I should add that this caters to the experienced MegaPlanner and is much too detailed for anyone else. For the latter, look at his main site, which is newly built and separate from the blog: http://www.megaplanning.com/

If you go to the BenSoc website you will notice that they also use a Strengths Based approach, as in how they help children and families (this links to Appreciative Inquiry - AI).

To sum up, MegaPlanning remains the overarching structure within which just about everything else fits. Social Leadership most certainly does and offers us a very powerful process for reaching Mega Level objectives.
[more]

Labels: , , ,

posted by Dr Ron @ 8:58 PM   0 comments
Business Seminars Australia
Previous Posts
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Archives
Links

Affiliates

BLOGGER disclosure policy
Digg
technorati
del.icio.us